Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Whether ecological anxiety paralyses or mobilises young people remains contested, and evidence from the Global South is limited.
Objective: To determine whether collective efficacy moderates the eco-anxiety-climate activism relationship and whether catalytic eco-anger mediates it among Indonesian Generation Z.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey included 1,500 participants aged 16-24 years recruited through public organizations in Palembang. Validated scales, regression, simple-slope analysis, and bootstrap mediation were used.
Results: Collective efficacy positively predicted activism and produced a crossover interaction: eco-anxiety predicted lower activism at low efficacy but higher activism at high efficacy. Catalytic eco-anger competitively mediated the association against a negative direct effect.
Conclusion: Collective efficacy conditions whether climate distress becomes organized activism, extending collective-action theory and informing Indonesian youth and climate policy.
Keywords
Article Details
Author ownership
Authors retain copyright and publishing rights in their work. Submission and publication do not transfer copyright ownership to HM Publisher, CMHC Research Center or OAIJSS.
Publication and reuse
Authors grant OAIJSS the right of first publication. The journal’s publication licence is the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Authors may reuse their own work and authorise additional uses, subject to any rights held by co-authors or third parties.
Self-archiving
Authors may deposit the submitted manuscript, accepted manuscript and published version in institutional or subject repositories without an embargo. Identify the version, acknowledge publication in OAIJSS and add the article DOI or journal link when available. Preserve the licence and attribution accompanying the deposited version.
Website copyright
Copyright notices for the OAIJSS website, layout and visual identity apply only to those elements. They do not replace or restrict the copyright and reuse rights of article authors.
