Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The use of crown witness evidence can only be seen in criminal cases in the form of participation, and separation of those criminal cases has been carried out since the preliminary examination process at the investigative level. Some parties argue that the use of crown witnesses is permissible because it aims to achieve a sense of public justice. However, some are of the opinion that the use of crown witnesses is not permissible because it is contrary to the basic rights and sense of justice of the accused. This is because the crown witness has the status of a defendant and has the right to remain silent or even the right to give answers that are denied or lie. This review aims to describe the use of crown witnesses and the power of crown witness statements in corruption trials in Indonesia.
Keywords
Article Details
Author ownership
Authors retain copyright and publishing rights in their work. Submission and publication do not transfer copyright ownership to HM Publisher, CMHC Research Center or OAIJSS.
Publication and reuse
Authors grant OAIJSS the right of first publication. The journal’s publication licence is the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Authors may reuse their own work and authorise additional uses, subject to any rights held by co-authors or third parties.
Self-archiving
Authors may deposit the submitted manuscript, accepted manuscript and published version in institutional or subject repositories without an embargo. Identify the version, acknowledge publication in OAIJSS and add the article DOI or journal link when available. Preserve the licence and attribution accompanying the deposited version.
Website copyright
Copyright notices for the OAIJSS website, layout and visual identity apply only to those elements. They do not replace or restrict the copyright and reuse rights of article authors.
